Skip to main content

SONNET SCHOOL SATURDAY MORNING


SONNET SCHOOL SATURDAY MORNING
Posted on FB 21 March 2020


Writing on the Sand' by Dante Gabriel Rossetti (1859).

Essentially the sonnet is a word production in 14 lines. These 14 lines consist of 8 lines (the octave) and 6 lines (the sestet). This is the convention that is kept with the great majority of sonnets written in English and other languages. This form evolved because it was easily memorable and you could say a lot in a little. Lovers like to say it succinctly, sensually, and without labouring the announcement. Polemicists wish to parade their opponent’s opinion (the octave), only to demolish it (the sestet). Mystics would draw our attention to wondrousness, only to increase the wonder, in case we weren’t paying enough attention the first time. The role you adopt in writing your sonnet can be of some use in how it is pitched and which words are chosen. Two members of Sonnet School are lawyers, for example, who know the skill of forwarding the evidence (the octave) only to draw attention to those details that will win the case (the sestet).

Some of you may be troubled by end rhymes. Rather than seeing this as a chore, play around with the possibilities, and don’t be afraid either to go for an outlandish rhyme or to abandon the existing word as resistant to rhyme. Good rhymes are there to heighten the meaning, to intensify or surprise with their connections, to make the sonnet a tight operation. If rhyme is not working for you then unrhymed endings are permitted, but remember you are also working with rhythms and metrical counts. Rhythm is often innate within the language you are using, but the line soon tests you to arrange words one way rather than another. You will start discovering the beauties of English syntax, syntax being the vital way in which emphasis falls, prize elements do their tricks, and sentences flow. Metre will mean syllable count, which is great when you want your sonnet trim, but my own view is it must not become the overriding force of the sonnet, otherwise it’s just dum-de-dum-de-dum. The main thing is enjoyment and to say something in your way. Trial and error is inevitable, such that you will wish to start a whole new sonnet out of irritation with the current one. You are free to use a layout other than octave-sestet, by the way.  

The other thing to do in school is read sonnets to see how they work. Find ones that work. Shakespeare is especially good because of his astounding flow (“How **does** he do it?” as Stephen Fry would say), his method of making an argument with his chosen set of thoughts and words, and because he revolutionised the form by making it satiric, political, moody, &c. as well as a romantic playing card. He wrote with three quatrains and a couplet, ever the one to have the last word. Dante Gabriel Rossetti said “A sonnet is a moment’s monument.” That sounds grandiose, if true, but more concerned with product than process. I think firstly we trust the process, i.e. what we want to say, leaving ourselves open to the unexpected places the words take us.
Any questions?    
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why did Dante write The Divine Comedy?

This is one of two short papers given by Philip Harvey at the first Spiritual Reading Group session for 2014 on Tuesday the 18 th of February in the Carmelite Library in Middle Park. He also gave a paper on that occasion, which can be found on the Library blog, entitled ‘A Rationale for Purgatory’ . Nadezhda Mandelstam recalls in one of her books how her husband, the Russian poet Osip Mandelstam, would say that when reading poetry we can spend a great deal of time discussing what it means, but the first and main question about a poem is not what does it mean, but why was it written. That is the place to start. Here are eleven reasons that I offer quietly to help us think about this poem: Why did Dante write The Divine Comedy? You may have other reasons and these are invited. We will spend most of our time today looking at meanings, but also at why. I wrote these out as they occurred to me, so there is no priority order. 1.      He wrote the poem because of Florence. Many o
4 comments
Read more

The Walk (Seamus Heaney)

This poem was read aloud at Janet Campbell’s funeral in Hamilton in Victoria in December 2006. Janet was a great lover of poetry all her life, a great reader of poetry, and she read everything of Seamus Heaney. Indeed, when she worked in Melbourne or London bookshops Janet would grab hold of Faber pre-publication copies of Heaney if they came into the backroom, and disappear for days, copying lines onto postcards for her friends, transferring lines into her lifetime of diaries. Diaries that were also a lifeline. Janet read everything, but Heaney was one of the regulars. Seamus Heaney keeps a tight line. He is rarely though completely opaque and the way into this poem is the word ‘longshot’. We only find in the second of the two poems that we are being asked to look at two photographs. Or, at least, poems that are like photographs. Or, better still, strong memories that have taken on in the mind the nature of longshots. The two poems in one are reminders of close relationships.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Poetry of Rowan Williams

Rowan Williams delivers the twelfth John Rylands Poetry Reading last year   This is a paper given by Philip Harvey in the Hughes Room at St Peter’s Church, Eastern Hill, Melbourne on Sunday the 6 th of December as one in an Advent series on religious poets. The original title of the paper was ‘The text that maps our losses and longings’. Everything Rowan Williams says and writes reveals a person with a highly developed sensitivity to language, its force, directness, instantaneousness, its subtlety, indirectness, longevity. A person though may speak three languages fluently and read at least nine languages with ease, as he does, and still not engage with language in the way we are looking at here. Because Rowan is unquestionably someone with a poetic gift. By that I don’t just mean he writes poetry, I mean he engages with the life of words, their meanings, ambiguities, colours, their playfulness, invention, sounds. We find this in those writings of his that deliberate
Post a Comment
Read more