Skip to main content

Samuel Beckett & the Rainbow Girl, by Steve Carey BLOOMSDAY IN MELBOURNE 2024

 The 31st annual Bloomsday in Melbourne staged a play at St Martin’s Theatre in South Yarra exploring the encounter between Samuel Beckett and the Joyce family in 1920s Paris. Review by Philip Harvey



The symbiotic relationship between an artist and their work is notorious in the case of James Joyce. Himself, his family and friends make major character appearances in his great fictions, albeit oblique, typified, parodied, and exaggerated to serve the author’s purposes. Similarly, his family and acquaintances are caught up in the creative act itself, for good or ill. This relationship, and its real-life consequences, are the driver of this year’s Bloomsday in Melbourne play, an informed drama about Joyce’s daughter Lucia (Mary Agnes O’Loughlin) and the unknown young turk fresh from Dublin, Samuel Beckett (Jeremy Harland).

Steve Carey’s play employs varied modes to dramatize the conjunction between the everyday and high art. A comic café dialogue between litterateurs using a cornucopia of famous English quotes may be followed by a scarifying domestic argument direct from the realist school, or a chaotic song-and-dance routine that teeters on the verge of incoherence (read: madness). Carey takes a leaf from Joyce’s book, it could be said, with this confident mixture of style devices. For a brief while we find ourselves again inside the way Joyce variously transposes the world in words.

With the aid of Beckett, the audience steps into the secluded, highly protected world of the Joyce family. Nora (Carissa McPherson) and Giorgio (Daniel Cook) must manage a household determined by the unpredictable Lucia and her father, the aloof, kooky, and imperious magus whose novel ‘Ulysses’ is now the sensation of twenties Paris. The set designer (Silvia Shao) positions Joyce (Tref Gare) at a desk elevated on a pedestal of hundreds of books and surrounded by a galaxy of depending pages, the object of his perpetual creative gaze. This symbolism of power and remoteness is the still point around which a great deal of energy and craziness turns, most significantly from Lucia.

Attention shifts regularly to the next drama in Lucia’s growth as a person seeking agency and validation. O’Loughlin’s performance pushes the boundaries. Her instinctive ambition to be a dancer, understandable in a city alive with modernist dance crazes, gradually turns into a manifestation of Lucia’s selfhood, a cry for help, and a test of her ability to meet the adult world. Her slinky, iridescent dance costumes, superbly designed by Frida Moss, cut across the others’ conventional dress sense, even that of the dandy Joyce. O’Loughlin meets the physical and verbal demands of the central role with gusto, depicting a woman who at one level is living in a world of her own while at the same time being extravagantly on show.

Gare’s Joyce tippy tiptoes through the fragile family relationships, Himself in a world of his own. Bloomsday in Melbourne has seen all manner of stage portraits of the artist. This year’s model must be simultaneously the literary lion in his den, the wordsmith gone half-crazy with the materials of his trade, and yet the responsible father who somehow understands his daughter, and her difficulties, in ways no one else can. This balance between hauteur and profound human sensitivity is ably achieved by the script and director Carl Whiteside’s timing and placement of scenes.

But it’s Beckett’s name’s in the play’s title, Beckett who is more or less the last person standing. (Ironically or not, Lucia Joyce’s name is not in the title; she is the rainbow girl, “fading out ... you can’t see her now.”) His apprenticeship assisting Joyce with transcribing the tarantella of ‘Work in Progress’ brings him into close proximity with Lucia. A fascination, a rapport, a friendship develops between them that might be something more but is nevertheless kept precarious. Harland plays the part with excellent formality, a necessary foil to the lithe cavortings, both linguistic and terpsichorean, of the wakeful Lucia. Carey’s close attention to biographical clues are the turning points of the play, Beckett gifting her a pair of dancing shoes that affirm her private ambitions while confirming the odd couple’s artistic commitments. She is given power to move, but at what cost?

Yet while Beckett’s encounter with Joyce teaches him he must follow a different creative path to Joyce to achieve his purposes, the same cannot be said of Lucia. Her parents’ exasperating inability to perceive Lucia’s inner creative drive not only leads them to stop the dancing mania in its tracks, nor can they offer a way forward for her pent-up energies of mind and body. We know Beckett will go on to produce his tense, spare works in French and English; Lucia will go into asylums. The concluding reprise of the opening scene has Beckett reconnecting with his friend years later during visiting hours. They relive the motif of dancing together, lucidity breaking through the miasma of weird crosstalk and sleep, like a page of ‘Finnegans Wake’. There’s something going on, but what is it? The play leaves us in a state of wistful, or perhaps that’s despairing, uncertainty.

Charming comic relief is brought to bear on this whole hothouse atmosphere in the form of Tomasso Grigio (Paolo Bartolomei). Not a name you will find in an Ellmann index, the colourful Grigio is an inspired hybrid of different literary types in the Joyce world, seemingly written with the stylish Bartolomei in mind. Italian was the language the Joyces spoke at home and Italian buoys up ‘Ulysses’, so bella figura is both appropriate and welcome in a drama that is a downward spiral towards Inferno. As Beckett’s counsellor and sidekick Bartolomei lifts the tempo, lends perspective, while his performance as a psychoanalyst who appeared to walk without aid of bone joints had to be seen to be believed.

Director Carl Whiteside and playwright Steve Carey appreciate that Lucia’s story not only has a lot of missing clues, it also lacks closure. The play engages with the existing debate about this intrinsic factor in the Joyce saga, knowing that many things remain conjectural. One theme of the play is how in death, as in life, Lucia is being sidelined and misunderstood. The theatrical resolution is to present a series of scenes, each one of which includes epiphanies (in the Joycean sense of the word) but also necessarily conundrums. Beckett’s entry into the Joyce inner world is the catalyst for a rich storyline, but one that quickly becomes Chekhovian in its conflicting desires and unintended consequences, with circumstances that are at once either ludicrously comic or painfully disastrous, depending on how we see them. As a contribution to Joyce studies this landmark play artfully leaves open the questions. As theatre, Whiteside and Carey have created a fast-moving enactment of social disintegration, a dance that bops till it drops.

 

  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why did Dante write The Divine Comedy?

This is one of two short papers given by Philip Harvey at the first Spiritual Reading Group session for 2014 on Tuesday the 18 th of February in the Carmelite Library in Middle Park. He also gave a paper on that occasion, which can be found on the Library blog, entitled ‘A Rationale for Purgatory’ . Nadezhda Mandelstam recalls in one of her books how her husband, the Russian poet Osip Mandelstam, would say that when reading poetry we can spend a great deal of time discussing what it means, but the first and main question about a poem is not what does it mean, but why was it written. That is the place to start. Here are eleven reasons that I offer quietly to help us think about this poem: Why did Dante write The Divine Comedy? You may have other reasons and these are invited. We will spend most of our time today looking at meanings, but also at why. I wrote these out as they occurred to me, so there is no priority order. 1.      He wrote the poem because ...

The Walk (Seamus Heaney)

This poem was read aloud at Janet Campbell’s funeral in Hamilton in Victoria in December 2006. Janet was a great lover of poetry all her life, a great reader of poetry, and she read everything of Seamus Heaney. Indeed, when she worked in Melbourne or London bookshops Janet would grab hold of Faber pre-publication copies of Heaney if they came into the backroom, and disappear for days, copying lines onto postcards for her friends, transferring lines into her lifetime of diaries. Diaries that were also a lifeline. Janet read everything, but Heaney was one of the regulars. Seamus Heaney keeps a tight line. He is rarely though completely opaque and the way into this poem is the word ‘longshot’. We only find in the second of the two poems that we are being asked to look at two photographs. Or, at least, poems that are like photographs. Or, better still, strong memories that have taken on in the mind the nature of longshots. The two poems in one are reminders of close relationships. ...

The Poetry of Rowan Williams

Rowan Williams delivers the twelfth John Rylands Poetry Reading last year   This is a paper given by Philip Harvey in the Hughes Room at St Peter’s Church, Eastern Hill, Melbourne on Sunday the 6 th of December as one in an Advent series on religious poets. The original title of the paper was ‘The text that maps our losses and longings’. Everything Rowan Williams says and writes reveals a person with a highly developed sensitivity to language, its force, directness, instantaneousness, its subtlety, indirectness, longevity. A person though may speak three languages fluently and read at least nine languages with ease, as he does, and still not engage with language in the way we are looking at here. Because Rowan is unquestionably someone with a poetic gift. By that I don’t just mean he writes poetry, I mean he engages with the life of words, their meanings, ambiguities, colours, their playfulness, invention, sounds. We find this in those writings of his that delibe...