Skip to main content

James Joyce, by Edna O’Brien



Here is a review by Philip Harvey written in 1999 or soon after, probably for Tain magazine in Melbourne. I only just noticed this again while searching through some files. When I went to find the book, it is signed by herself, Edna O’Brien. My guess is I ordered the book through Kenny’s Bookshop of Galway.  

James Joyce, by Edna O’Brien. (London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1999) 0-297-84243-9

Anyone who writes a biography of James Joyce after Richard Ellman invites being called, at best, very brave and at worst, an epigone. In recent times mammoth biographies have emerged of Joyce’s wife and his father, making us wonder who will be next. His brother Stanislaus, perhaps, or their sister Margaret who became a nun and went to New Zealand? Hopefully not. This latest biographical burst only suggests how thoroughly the ground has been raked.

Edna O’Brien’s attempt is uncritically adulatory of the Master and must have been written to a word limit. Adulation can backfire. O’Brien’s repeated emphasis on Joyce’s drinking and neglect of his family seems unwarranted in such a short book, especially when we are not given much coverage or insight into such central questions as why Joyce wrote the books he did and why in the way he did. However, her biography is worth the time expended, especially if you are a beginner to Joyce or want some startling reminders of what made him something different.

Perhaps the most striking feature is O’Brien’s adopted style, an authoritative voice that piles up fact upon fact in breathless succession. It serves to remind us of Joyce’s drivenness, the excessive knowledge he commanded and how much he pushed boundaries. Hard though to find the Joyce who, in Zurich, showed a guest the river with the exclamation “That’s the Limmat!”

A newcomer will find the detail seductive; the seasoned Joycean ought to be entertained by its novelish arrangement. Interestingly, O’Brien’s only really original ideas concern that subject for which she is famously renowned: femininity. She defends her man against the malign attacks of Kate Millet and Marilyn French, reminding us of his great achievement in eroticising and making present the female (and the male) body. Also, his inspired choice of a secular Dublin Jew as the example of ‘the new feminine man’, with the psychological and ludic implications that go with such a character. The time is ripe for some revisions on Joyce and gender, and though O’Brien’s comments are hardly earthshattering they do point up the shortcomings of some feminist critics. Other types of critic are conspicuous by their absence.

Edna O’Brien identifies with Joyce the Dublin gadfly, the artist who exposed that city’s prejudices and power structures in comic ways that could not be contradicted. After all, she’s a Dublin gadfly herself, whose exile from Ireland has its own darker meanings. Ireland is still getting accustomed, slowly, to its greatest novelist, eighty years after Ulysses, and this biography can only help along with the healing process.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why did Dante write The Divine Comedy?

This is one of two short papers given by Philip Harvey at the first Spiritual Reading Group session for 2014 on Tuesday the 18 th of February in the Carmelite Library in Middle Park. He also gave a paper on that occasion, which can be found on the Library blog, entitled ‘A Rationale for Purgatory’ . Nadezhda Mandelstam recalls in one of her books how her husband, the Russian poet Osip Mandelstam, would say that when reading poetry we can spend a great deal of time discussing what it means, but the first and main question about a poem is not what does it mean, but why was it written. That is the place to start. Here are eleven reasons that I offer quietly to help us think about this poem: Why did Dante write The Divine Comedy? You may have other reasons and these are invited. We will spend most of our time today looking at meanings, but also at why. I wrote these out as they occurred to me, so there is no priority order. 1.      He wrote the poem because of Florence. Many o

The Walk (Seamus Heaney)

This poem was read aloud at Janet Campbell’s funeral in Hamilton in Victoria in December 2006. Janet was a great lover of poetry all her life, a great reader of poetry, and she read everything of Seamus Heaney. Indeed, when she worked in Melbourne or London bookshops Janet would grab hold of Faber pre-publication copies of Heaney if they came into the backroom, and disappear for days, copying lines onto postcards for her friends, transferring lines into her lifetime of diaries. Diaries that were also a lifeline. Janet read everything, but Heaney was one of the regulars. Seamus Heaney keeps a tight line. He is rarely though completely opaque and the way into this poem is the word ‘longshot’. We only find in the second of the two poems that we are being asked to look at two photographs. Or, at least, poems that are like photographs. Or, better still, strong memories that have taken on in the mind the nature of longshots. The two poems in one are reminders of close relationships.

The Poetry of Rowan Williams

Rowan Williams delivers the twelfth John Rylands Poetry Reading last year   This is a paper given by Philip Harvey in the Hughes Room at St Peter’s Church, Eastern Hill, Melbourne on Sunday the 6 th of December as one in an Advent series on religious poets. The original title of the paper was ‘The text that maps our losses and longings’. Everything Rowan Williams says and writes reveals a person with a highly developed sensitivity to language, its force, directness, instantaneousness, its subtlety, indirectness, longevity. A person though may speak three languages fluently and read at least nine languages with ease, as he does, and still not engage with language in the way we are looking at here. Because Rowan is unquestionably someone with a poetic gift. By that I don’t just mean he writes poetry, I mean he engages with the life of words, their meanings, ambiguities, colours, their playfulness, invention, sounds. We find this in those writings of his that deliberate