St. John's Church, Little Gidding, Cambridgeshire, England
On Thursday the 21st
of April Will Johnston, Robert Gribben and I gave a presentation on T.S. Eliot
to the Institute for Spiritual Studies at St. Peter’s Church, Eastern Hill,
Melbourne. Here is the first part of my contribution to the evening.
Thursday
the 21st of April 2016 starts early. Intermittent rain predicted.
Because
I do not hope to turn again
Because
I do not hope
Because
I do not hope to turn
I
wake up from my sleep. Lorikeets chatter in trees of the Heidelberg District.
Today I am committed to giving a presentation in town. It’s going to be about
Thomas Stearns Eliot. Stearns always seemed like a warning of what was to come
and we all know that Thomas is the one who doubts. Eliot, a moderately common
name, however we spell it. I knew someone who had a cat called Eliot.
Of
names of this kind, I can give you a quorum,
Such as Munkustrap, Quaxo, or
Coricopat,
Such
as Bombalurina, or else Jellylorum –
Names that never belong to more than
one cat.
I’m
still turning over the dream I just had. It was one of those ‘nothing to say’
dreams. I arrive to give a paper on Eliot and find I have nothing to say.
And
should I then presume?
And
how should I begin?
My
dream had some of the recurring scenes that recur only in dreams. Eliot wishes
such formative scenes into his poetry.
And
an old white horse galloped away in the meadow.
Eliot
writes out some of these images again and again, haunted or inspired by their
beauty and mystery, as though they held the meaning, even if the meaning could
not be named.
Footfalls
echo in the memory
Down
the passage which we did not take
Towards
the door we never opened
Into
the rose-garden.
Now
it really is time to get up.
With
the other masquerades
That
time resumes,
One
thinks of all the hands
That
are raising dingy shades
In
a thousand furnished rooms.
Or
just thinks of getting people ready for work and school. Shave and shower.
There
will be time, there will be time
To
prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet.
Dress
and comb. Over fresh orange juice and toast I try to tease out an issue.
Question: “Clearly the silence in the last twenty years of his life was the
silence of wisdom. And Valerie Eliot helped.” My daughter has only one thing to
say: “Oh no, not Eliot, again!” My wife is more sympathetic. “Yes,
Valerie stabilised things for him.” Coffee is poured into a large breakfast
cup.
I
have measured out my life with coffee spoons.
But
I have to cut down on my sugar intake. I just read the other day that sugar is
actually poison to the system. Soon we will drive to the station. The 7.55
waits at the platform for the usual band of commuters.
A cold coming we had of it,
Just
the worst time of the year
For
a journey, and such a long journey.
Southern
Cross Station, anyway. The sun is up and who knows hot air balloons are rising
above the parks. But no, it threatens rain.
April
is the cruellest month, breeding
Lilacs
out of the dead land, mixing
Memory
and desire, stirring
Dull
roots with spring rain.
Not
that it’s spring here, but autumn. Things start coming back, school lessons,
how Eliot subverts the English poetic delight in April, the sign of spring and
Easter, that runs from Chaucer’s April with his showers sweet right through to Browning’s
now that April’s here. Eliot focuses on the underground suffering that brings
life, and on our subconscious dependencies. I gaze out the window at Melbourne
passing by.
And
now you live dispersed on ribbon roads,
And
no man knows or cares who is his neighbour
Unless
his neighbour makes too much disturbance,
But
all dash to and fro in motor cars,
Familiar
with the roads and settled nowhere.
Eliot
wrote those words aghast at the impersonal expansion of our cities, while we
take sprawl for granted. We even write poems in praise of sprawl, like Les
Murray. I suppose travelling on the escalators of Southern Cross Station feels
a bit like Dante in Purgatory. And gazing across the concourses, lines like
these come to mind in a certain mood:
A
crowd flowed over London Bridge, so many,
I
had not thought death had undone so many.
We,
of course, live in the world’s most liveable city. We are told this every day,
as though repetition alone makes it so. Liveable city.
Unreal
City.
Though
in today’s vernacular, unreal is the same as sick and wicked and ‘bad as’ and
other negatives turned positives – a term of approval, like ‘awesome as’.
Unreal
City.
It
could be the rap song on my neighbour’s iPod.
For
last year’s words belong to last year’s language
And next year’s words await another voice.
Reading
the news on the internet is the first thing to do on arrival at work.
The
word of the Lord came unto me, saying …
I
have given you speech, for endless palaver,
I
have given you my Law, and you set up commissions.
Forty
prominent Australians have written to the Prime Minister in light of the Panama
Papers. Wesley College was blown up. They still haven’t found the culprit.
Macavity’s
not there!
Donald
Trump’s hairdresser is interviewed. What would his hair look like if he jumped
into a pool? Reply: Have you ever seen Cousin Itt? People use their iPhones
each day on average a whopping eighty times. That’s called infotainment. It is
curious and challenging to read about all the kingdoms of the world on a small
screen and all the worst things happening there.
Some
went from love of glory,
Some
went who were restless and curious,
Some
were rapacious and lustful.
Many
left their bodies to the kites of Syria
Or
sea-strewn along the routes;
Many
left their souls in Syria,
Living
on, sunken in moral corruption;
Many
came back well broken,
Diseased
and beggared, finding
A
stranger at the door in possession:
Came
home cracked by the sun of the East
And
the seven deadly sins in Syria.
Too
much internet, too many emails, too many committees, too much politics.
Human kind
Cannot
bear very much reality.
I
work in a library in Middle Park, very near the Bay. If the sea rises, as the
climatologists predict, we will soon be under water.
I
shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled.
Eliot
worked in a bank, then in a publishing house. He was fortunate, you’d have to
say, always landed on his feet. Work became an escape from people, especially
his first wife, Vivien. Vivien is an undisputed presence in his great shattering
masterpiece The Wasteland.
I
can connect
Nothing
with nothing.
It
was all too much by the time Vivien was walking the London streets with a sign
around her neck ‘I am the wife of T.S. Eliot’.
How
unpleasant to meet Mr. Eliot!
With
his features of clerical cut,
And
his brow so grim
And
his mouth so prim
And
his conversation, so nicely
Restricted
to What Precisely
And
if and Perhaps and But.
I
am a reader of Mr Eliot. There are signs everywhere saying I am going to talk
about him tonight. But what am I going to say? Work pays the bills, it’s also a
refuge from other cares.
And
they write innumerable books; being too vain and
distracted for silence: seeking each one after his
own elevation, and dodging his emptiness.
I’m
sure this isn’t the only reason we have libraries, but they do continue to
write innumerable books.
Where
is the life we have lost in living?
Where
is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
Where
is the knowledge we have lost in information?
These
lines reproach the information revolution our technology now saturates us with
daily, while meanwhile libraries go on being selective, restoring what
otherwise is lost.
These
fragments I have shored against my ruins.
And
if the Antarctic waters cover Middle Park we will have to shift the library to
higher ground. Emerald Hill, for example. The satellite graphic in this week’s
newspaper indicates it will have to be renamed the Emerald isle.
Do
I dare to eat a peach?
My
walk to the Middle Park Village to buy lunch means passing cats standing on
millionaires’ porches.
When
you notice a cat in profound meditation,
The reason, I tell you, is always the same:
His
mind is engaged in a rapt contemplation
Of the thought, of the thought, of the thought of
his name:
His ineffable effable
Effanineffable
Deep
and inscrutable singular name.
Effanineffable.
Eliot must have made that up. He made up lots of words. Polyphiloprogenitve.
Grimpen. The editors of the new Annotated Edition tear their hair out trying to
find the first use, but often it’s Eliot. Talking of peaches, has anyone
noticed the absence of food in Eliot? Back at the library, lunch in hand, I
google ‘Food in T.S. Eliot’: 548,000 hits in 0.59 seconds.
A
Cooking Egg.
Not
much in the pantry and maybe unexplored potential. Through the afternoon I
enjoy remembering enthusiasts who introduced me to influences. We all do this,
who live in relationship. I think of my father.
I had seen birth and death,
But
had thought they were different.
He
had old Faber originals and would quote from them in sermons.
… this Birth was
Hard
and bitter agony for us, like Death, our death.
Then
there’s my school history teacher, Nigel Jackson. We could expect Eliot in any
of his classes.
My words echo
Thus,
in your mind.
And
I remember my university tutor Robin Grove.
Time
past and time future
What
might have been and what has been
Point
to one end, which is always present.
Robin
quoted this after recalling an experience of hearing the Ormond College bell
one night while walking the college path in Parkville.
Only
through time time is conquered.
Only
later did we see Robin was trying to get us to recognise that experience
in our own lives. This was not just some Romantic notion of time standing
still, but a pressing matter of awareness, a deepening sharing of presence, the
personal place where mindfulness may turn to contemplation, where we are at
one, if only for a moment. Robin talked in one lecture about how Eliot’s poetry
enacts what it talks about, the poetry describes its subject through its own
rhythm, repetitions and sounds. He quoted Burnt Norton.
Only by the form, the pattern,
Can
words or music reach
The
stillness, as a Chinese jar still
moves
perpetually in its stillness.
I
remember university friends who are no longer with us. Hugh Crole, who painted
artworks based on the line
He
do the police in different voices.
Hugh
became a dedicated thinker and drinker. We heard at his memorial at Trinity
College Chapel that on his deathbed, in that hermitage of artistic escape,
Byron Bay, a close friend recited to Hugh the line
And
all shall be well.
To
which he replied
And
all manner of thing shall be well.
And
I remember my friend Janet Campbell, someone who drove us all happy and mad in
equal measure, who wrote her English thesis on Four Quartets and could quote
Eliot at the drop of a hat.
The
tiger in the tiger-pit
Is
not more irritable than I.
Weave,
weave the sunlight in your hair.
Janet
was a qualified enthusiast for poetry and would declare that she had to “do
justice to T.S.!”
The
houses are all gone under the sea.
Janet
would declaim.
The
dancers are all gone under the hill.
A
steady day at the library. Borrowers
come and go
Talking
of Michelangelo
They’re
unlikely to think what I’m thinking. For example, what is the purpose of
poetry? The borrowers have a purpose, but is it poetry? Re-reading Eliot he
offers so many answers.
I
am moved by fancies that are curled
Around
these images, and cling:
The
notion of some infinitely gentle
Infinitely
suffering thing.
But
as much as he holds to Coleridge’s idea of fancies
Between
the conception
And
the creation
Between
the emotion
And
the response
Falls
the Shadow
Eliot
has read across literature and knows
Words strain,
Crack
and sometimes break, under the burden,
Under
the tension, slip, slide, perish,
Decay
with imprecision, will not stay in place,
Will
not stay still.
And
yet Eliot persists
Since
our concern was speech and speech impelled us
To purify the dialect of the tribe
And urge the mind to aftersight and foresight.
What
am I going to say about Eliot anyway? The time approaches, if time can be said
to approach. Time to close the library.
Let us go then, you and I,
When
the evening is spread out against the sky
Like
a patient etherised upon a table.
Or maybe like a surfer in his wetsuit reclining on the
beach. Or maybe like Gene Kelly soaked and singing from a lamppost. My wife and
I sometimes play this analogy game, it’s a playful riff. And so, after
something light to eat, I head towards St. Peter’s. Going to church became a
regular part of Eliot’s life after 1927. And here I am, going to church, as so
often and regularly.
And
Easter Day, we didn’t get to the country,
So
we took young Cyril to church. And they rang a bell
And
he said right out loud, crumpets.
I
don’t know anyone who goes to church who hasn’t sometime wondered why they’re
there, and conversely known it’s precisely where they are supposed to be. Eliot
lives with this seeming ambiguity.
We
shall not cease from exploration
And
the end of all our exploring
Will
be to arrive where we started
And
know the place for the first time.
And
so we all start arriving at the seminar, by tram or car or train or foot (or,
given this rain, by boat). And what if what we say is misconstrued, or the
expression unclear?
That
is not what I meant at all
That
is not it, at all.
And
what if instead of Matthew Arnold’s sweetness and light, Groucho Marx hands us
an exploding cigar? This is the way the seminar will go, not with a whimper but
a bang. And what does everyone hope to hear? I’m not sure, quite.
After
much knowledge, what forgiveness?
And
going away afterwards, what then?
Time
present and time past
Are
both perhaps present in time future,
And
time future contained in time past.
Somewhere
we have to make a beginning and it’s still Thursday the 21st of
April 2016.
Dear Philip of Trinity times past, might you kindly let me know something of the circumstances of Hugh's demise? I was very saddened by the news, which only recently came to me. Craig Mcgregor (cmprague@gmail.com)
ReplyDelete