Skip to main content

Emily Brontë, Elizabeth Barrett Browning & Christina Rossetti 1: Emily Brontë (1818-1838)

 



Emily Brontë (1818-1848)

Portrait by Branwell Brontë

 

A paper and poetry reading given at St Peter’s Church, Eastern Hill, Melbourne as part of the series ‘Poets and the Faith’ on Tuesday the 13th of August 2024.

“Darkness was overtraced on every face” 

Darkness was overtraced on every face

Around clouded with storm and ominous gloom

In Hut or hall smiled out no resting place

There was no resting place but one – the tomb

 

All our hearts were the mansions of distress

And no one laughed and none seemed free from care

Our children felt their fathers’ wretchedness

Our homes one all were shadowed with despair

 

It was not fear that made the land so sad

 

The great majority of poems written by Emily Brontë are short expressions of desire, solitude, separation, isolation, hostility, distress, loss, longing, anguish, tempest, hopelessness, suffering.

Readers know about these states of being from her novel. It is no secret to anyone in the world that ‘Wuthering Heights’ is one of the great shockwaves of English Literature, a work that was lightning and thunder upon its appearance in early Victorian England. That is how the novel was first received and no amount of Kate Bush fantasy gothic romance can veil from the receptive reader Emily Brontë‘s wild and seemingly unredeemed cast of characters, their own isolation, cruelty and self-absorption; their longings, desires, and sometimes brutal honesty. A lifelong fan of the novel was the Victorian poet Algernon Swinburne, who called ‘Wuthering Heights’ “essentially and definitely a poem in the fullest and most positive sense of the term.” (Brownson) Which I take to mean, the severity of her story is turned into redemptive vision by the power of her own language. It is a vision unto itself, whatever we make of it. So this is Emily. Charlotte Brontë once described her sister as “a solitude-loving raven, no gentle dove.” Yet we know this is not the end of the story, because we have poems like ‘To Imagination’.

To Imagination

 

When weary with the long day’s care,

   And earthly change from pain to pain,

And lost and ready to despair,

   Thy kind voice calls me back again:

Oh, my true friend! I am not lone,

Whilst thou canst speak with such a tone!

 

So hopeless is the world without,

   The world within I doubly prize;

Thy world, where guile, and hate, and doubt,

   And cold suspicion never rise;

Where thou, and I, and Liberty,

Have undisputed sovereignty.

 

What matters it, that, all around,

   Danger, and guilt, and darkness lie,

If but within our bosom’s bound

   We hold a bright, untroubled sky,

Warm with ten thousand mingled rays

Of suns that know no winter days?

 

Reason, indeed, may oft complain

   For Nature’s sad reality,

And tell the suffering heart how vain

   Its cherished dreams must always be;

And truth may rudely trample down

The flowers of Fancy, newly-blown:

 

But, thou art ever there, to bring

   The hovering vision back, and breathe

New glories o’er the blighted spring,

   And call a lovelier Life from Death,

And whisper, with a voice divine,

Of real worlds, as bright as thine.

 

I trust not to thy phantom bliss,

   Yet still, in evening’s quiet hour,

With never-failing thankfulness,

    I welcome thee, Benignant Power;

Sure solacer of human cares,

And sweeter hope, when hope despairs!

 

This poem, with its exemplary calmness of voice and rhyme pattern repeatedly finding resolution inside each verse, speaks up against the near despair we find elsewhere in her writing. The words declare the saving value of the imagination. Imagination images the world anew, serving creativity. Imagination has the power to shape and unify thought. This poem is Coleridge’s influential theory writ intimately, one we have heard about already from Rowan Williams in his presentation on R.S. Thomas. Imagination is superior to Fancy, those products that can all too readily be overridden by truth. Still, for Emily, although imagination itself  may prove “vain” at times, and she cannot trust its “phantom bliss”, yet she gives thanks for imagination, calls it a “Benignant Power” and “solacer”, a source of hope.      

An elementary fact about the Brontë sisters is that they grew up, indeed lived the greater length of their lives, in a parsonage. The Yorkshire moors bring out internal turmoil in Emily, but may also be heard as her sacred place of release and freedom; at times, the landscape is even where she finds intimations of paradise. The sisters lost their mother at an early age, then to be raised by her sister and their father, the Revd Patrick Brontë, an Anglican clergyman of Calvinist persuasion influenced by the Methodist movement. While this sounds austere and strict, the biographies balance this upbringing with two pluses that inform their writing at every turn: a strong sense of moral responsibility and an unbounded encouragement of the creative mind. Free enquiry was encouraged. This emphasis on personal and social improvement, it can confidently be understood, came from their homelife in Haworth in Yorkshire.       

Last Lines

 

   No coward soul is mine,

No trembler in the world’s storm-troubled sphere:

   I see Heaven’s glories shine,

And faith shines equal, arming me from fear.

 

   O God within my breast,

Almighty, ever-present Deity:

   Life – that in me has rest,

As I – undying Life – have power in Thee!

 

   Vain are the thousand creeds

That move men’s hearts: unutterably vain;

   Worthless as wither’d weeds.

Or idlest froth amid the boundless main,

 

   To waken doubt in one

Holding so fast by thine infinity;

   So surely anchor’d on

The steadfast rock of immortality.

 

   With wide-embracing love

Thy Spirit animates eternal years,

   Pervades and broods above,

Changes, sustains, dissolves, creates, and rears.

 

   Though earth and man were gone,

And suns and universes ceased to be,

   And thou were left alone,

Every existence would exist in Thee.

 

   There is not room for Death,

Nor atom that his might could render void:

   Thou – Thou art Being and Breath,

And what Thou art may never be destroy’d. 

Readers over two centuries have arrived at various conclusions about Emily Bronte. She is a pantheist, a stoic, a sceptic, a Romantic, a post-Romantic, an enthusiast… Like Shakespeare, she is the object of any number of projections, often based on the reader’s own wishes or prejudices. Let me join this throng of projections with my own. ‘No coward soul is mine’ is a most distinctive breakthrough in her thinking, written in extremis as she faces death at the age of 30. It is the culmination, for this reason, of her poetic journey. One critic says the words “show in themselves her dominating character, the intrepidity of her thought, and the wing-force of her poetry.” ((Dimnet 120)

What has been called Emily’s “singular self-possession” (Dimnet 120) must be placed beside her disdainful dismissal of “the thousand creeds/ That move men’s hearts: unutterably vain.” Clues to this seeming contradiction are found in this biographical story. 

‘Outside the family circle, Emily was only once heard to comment on the subject of religion, and her remark was as laconic as it was typical. [A friend] Mary Taylor has related how she once told Charlotte, ‘… that some one had asked me what religion I was of (with a view of getting me for a partisan) and that I had said that that was between God and me. Emily (who was lying on the hearthrug) exclaimed. “That’s right.” This was all I ever heard Emily say on religious subjects.’ (Lock 368) 

Religion here means all the various versions of Christian church and practice available in the British Isles at the time, and all other beliefs secular and otherwise, and we can conclude that Emily won’t have anything to do with any of it! This story needs to be read in the light of other reports that when Emily was present in the Brontë box-pew in church, “she would sit with her back to the pulpit ... bolt upright … as motionless as a statue.” (Lock 368-9) It needs to be remembered that her father was the preacher, but even more interesting is the general perception then and since that Emily was the child most like Patrick Brontë. They had more in common than the others. In other words, Emily is not dismissing “the thousand creeds” as such; she is rejecting anything in religion, anything at all, that comes between us and God. And I will suggest, that the phrase “unutterably vain”, a recurring line of thought in Emily’s writing, derives directly from the Book of Ecclesiastes, where all is vanity, saith the Preacher.

      I see heaven's glories shine and faith shines equal, arming me from fear,” she writes late in her short life. Restlessly and firmly, Brontë words her experience, prioritising imagination, nature, and God.    

Emily Brontë Sources

Works

The complete poems. Edited with an introduction by Janet Gezari. Penguin Books, 1992

The night is darkening round me. Penguin Books, 2015

Also

Juliet Barker. ‘Emily Jane Brontë”, in Oxford dictionary of national

biography, volume 7, pp. 848-852. Oxford University Press, 2004

Siobhan Craft Brownson. Emily Brontë, 1818-1848. At Poetry Foundation website, Chicago: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/emily-bronte

Ernest Dimnet. The Brontë sisters. Jonathan Cape, 1927

Juliet Gardiner. The illustrated letters of the Brontës. Batsford, 2021

Margaret Lane. The Brontë story : a reconsideration of Mrs. Gaskell’s Life of Charlotte Brontë. Heinemann, 1953

John Lock &  W. T. Dixon. A man of sorrows : the life, letters and times of the Rev. Patrick Brontë 1777-1861. Nelson, 1965

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why did Dante write The Divine Comedy?

This is one of two short papers given by Philip Harvey at the first Spiritual Reading Group session for 2014 on Tuesday the 18 th of February in the Carmelite Library in Middle Park. He also gave a paper on that occasion, which can be found on the Library blog, entitled ‘A Rationale for Purgatory’ . Nadezhda Mandelstam recalls in one of her books how her husband, the Russian poet Osip Mandelstam, would say that when reading poetry we can spend a great deal of time discussing what it means, but the first and main question about a poem is not what does it mean, but why was it written. That is the place to start. Here are eleven reasons that I offer quietly to help us think about this poem: Why did Dante write The Divine Comedy? You may have other reasons and these are invited. We will spend most of our time today looking at meanings, but also at why. I wrote these out as they occurred to me, so there is no priority order. 1.      He wrote the poem because ...

The Walk (Seamus Heaney)

This poem was read aloud at Janet Campbell’s funeral in Hamilton in Victoria in December 2006. Janet was a great lover of poetry all her life, a great reader of poetry, and she read everything of Seamus Heaney. Indeed, when she worked in Melbourne or London bookshops Janet would grab hold of Faber pre-publication copies of Heaney if they came into the backroom, and disappear for days, copying lines onto postcards for her friends, transferring lines into her lifetime of diaries. Diaries that were also a lifeline. Janet read everything, but Heaney was one of the regulars. Seamus Heaney keeps a tight line. He is rarely though completely opaque and the way into this poem is the word ‘longshot’. We only find in the second of the two poems that we are being asked to look at two photographs. Or, at least, poems that are like photographs. Or, better still, strong memories that have taken on in the mind the nature of longshots. The two poems in one are reminders of close relationships. ...

The Poetry of Rowan Williams

Rowan Williams delivers the twelfth John Rylands Poetry Reading last year   This is a paper given by Philip Harvey in the Hughes Room at St Peter’s Church, Eastern Hill, Melbourne on Sunday the 6 th of December as one in an Advent series on religious poets. The original title of the paper was ‘The text that maps our losses and longings’. Everything Rowan Williams says and writes reveals a person with a highly developed sensitivity to language, its force, directness, instantaneousness, its subtlety, indirectness, longevity. A person though may speak three languages fluently and read at least nine languages with ease, as he does, and still not engage with language in the way we are looking at here. Because Rowan is unquestionably someone with a poetic gift. By that I don’t just mean he writes poetry, I mean he engages with the life of words, their meanings, ambiguities, colours, their playfulness, invention, sounds. We find this in those writings of his that delibe...